The outcomes book: debate and consensus after the WPA outcomes statement

Introduction Celebrating and complicating the outcomes statement -- Part one: Contextualizing the outcomes statement -- The origins of the outcomes statement -- The outcomes project: the insiders’ history -- Standards, outcomes and All that Jazz -- Outcomes are not mandates for standardization -- Expanding our understanding of composing outcomes -- Part two: The outcomes statement and first-year writing -- The WPA outcomes statement goes to high school -- The outcomes statement at a community college: verification, accreditation, and articulation -- Critical thinking, reading, and writing: a view from the field -- More than the latest PC buzzword for modes: what genre theory means to composition -- Processes and outcomes in Arizona’s higher education system -- Knowledge of conventions and the logic of error -- Celebrating through interrogation: considering the outcomes statement through theoretical lenses

Part three: The outcomes statement beyond first-year writing -- What the outcomes statement could mean for writing across the curriculum -- First-year outcomes and upper-level writing -- Using the outcomes statement for technical communication -- Using writing outcomes to enhance teaching and learning: Alverno College’s experience -- What the outcomes statement is not: a reading of the Boyer Commission report -- Part four: Theorizing outcomes -- The outcomes statement as theorizing potential: through a looking glass -- A friendly challenge to push the outcomes statement further -- Outcomes and the developing learner -- Practice: the road to the outcomes over time -- Afterword: Bowling together developing, distributing, and using the WPA outcomes statement-and making cultural change

The WPA Outcomes Statement is important because it represents a working consensus among composition scholars about what college students should learn and do in a composition program. But as a single-page document, the statement cannot convey the kind of reflective process that a writing program must undertake to address the learning outcomes described